Back to Blog
Researchresearchstoragetype-systemarchitectureprotocols

Pluggable Typed-Storage Protocols for AI Memory Systems

A structural approach to composable storage backends using protocol-based polymorphism with runtime capability detection, enabling seamless coordination of relational, vector, and graph databases.

Matthew LongDecember 18, 20254 min read

Pluggable Typed-Storage Protocols

A Structural Approach to Composable Storage Backends for AI Memory Systems

Download: PDF | LaTeX Source

Abstract

We introduce Pluggable Typed-Storage Protocols, a novel architectural pattern for constructing composable, type-safe storage systems in AI memory applications. Our approach leverages structural subtyping (Protocol classes) to achieve backend polymorphism without inheritance hierarchies, combined with runtime capability detection for graceful feature degradation.

We formalize the theoretical foundations drawing from type theory, category theory, and software architecture principles, establishing a correspondence between storage protocols and morphisms in a category of storage capabilities.

Key Contributions

1. Protocol-Based Polymorphism

Using structural subtyping (duck typing with static verification) to define storage interfaces without requiring inheritance.

2. Capability-Based Feature Detection

Runtime introspection of backend capabilities enabling graceful degradation and optimal routing.

3. Coordinated Multi-Backend Storage

A StorageRouter pattern that maintains consistency across heterogeneous backends while preserving their individual strengths.

The Multi-Backend Challenge

AI memory systems face a fundamental tension: no single storage technology optimally serves all access patterns:

OperationOptimal BackendRationale
Semantic searchVector DBEmbedding similarity, ANN algorithms
Exact recallRelational DBB-tree indexes, ACID guarantees
Relationship queriesGraph DBTraversal, path finding
Keyword searchFull-text indexInverted indexes, ranking
Session storageRelational DBTransactional integrity

Traditional approaches suffer from:

  • Inheritance-based polymorphism: Creates rigid hierarchies that resist extension
  • Adapter patterns: Introduce runtime overhead and obscure capabilities
  • Direct backend coupling: Prevents migration and testing

The Protocol Solution

Our approach uses Python's Protocol classes for structural subtyping:

from typing import Protocol, runtime_checkable

@runtime_checkable
class StorageProtocol(Protocol):
    """Base protocol for all storage backends."""

    def save(self, memory: Memory) -> str: ...
    def get(self, memory_id: str) -> Memory | None: ...
    def delete(self, memory_id: str) -> bool: ...

    @property
    def capabilities(self) -> StorageCapabilities: ...

Any class implementing these methods satisfies the protocol—no inheritance required.

Capability Detection

Backends declare their capabilities at runtime:

@dataclass
class StorageCapabilities:
    supports_vector_search: bool = False
    supports_graph_queries: bool = False
    supports_full_text: bool = False
    supports_transactions: bool = False
    max_embedding_dimensions: int = 0

The StorageRouter uses these capabilities for intelligent routing:

class StorageRouter:
    def search(self, query: str, **kwargs) -> list[Memory]:
        if self.vector_store.capabilities.supports_vector_search:
            return self.vector_store.semantic_search(query)
        else:
            # Fallback to full-text search
            return self.relational_store.text_search(query)

Results

Our evaluation in the ContextFS AI memory system demonstrates:

  • 67% reduction in coupling compared to inheritance-based designs
  • Sub-50ms latency overhead for the routing layer
  • 100% recovery rate from simulated backend failures
  • Zero-downtime backend migrations through capability-based switching

Theoretical Foundation

We establish a category-theoretic framework where:

  • Storage backends are objects
  • Protocol implementations are morphisms
  • Capability sets form a lattice structure
  • The StorageRouter is a universal construction

This formalization enables reasoning about storage system composition and proves properties like graceful degradation.

Implementation in ContextFS

ContextFS implements this pattern across three backend types:

  1. SQLite/PostgreSQL: Relational storage with ACID guarantees
  2. ChromaDB: Vector embeddings for semantic search
  3. FalkorDB (optional): Graph database for relationship queries

The StorageRouter coordinates these backends transparently, routing queries to the optimal backend based on runtime capabilities.

Conclusion

The Pluggable Typed-Storage Protocol pattern establishes a new paradigm for building resilient, extensible storage systems that can evolve with the rapidly changing landscape of AI infrastructure. By combining structural typing with capability detection, we achieve the flexibility of duck typing with the safety of static verification.

References

  1. Python Protocol Classes (PEP 544)
  2. Category Theory for Programmers - Bartosz Milewski
  3. Type-Safe Context Engineering - Long, M. (2025)
  4. ContextFS Architecture Paper - Long, M. (2025)