Pluggable Typed-Storage Protocols for AI Memory Systems
A structural approach to composable storage backends using protocol-based polymorphism with runtime capability detection, enabling seamless coordination of relational, vector, and graph databases.
Pluggable Typed-Storage Protocols
A Structural Approach to Composable Storage Backends for AI Memory Systems
Download: PDF | LaTeX Source
Abstract
We introduce Pluggable Typed-Storage Protocols, a novel architectural pattern for constructing composable, type-safe storage systems in AI memory applications. Our approach leverages structural subtyping (Protocol classes) to achieve backend polymorphism without inheritance hierarchies, combined with runtime capability detection for graceful feature degradation.
We formalize the theoretical foundations drawing from type theory, category theory, and software architecture principles, establishing a correspondence between storage protocols and morphisms in a category of storage capabilities.
Key Contributions
1. Protocol-Based Polymorphism
Using structural subtyping (duck typing with static verification) to define storage interfaces without requiring inheritance.
2. Capability-Based Feature Detection
Runtime introspection of backend capabilities enabling graceful degradation and optimal routing.
3. Coordinated Multi-Backend Storage
A StorageRouter pattern that maintains consistency across heterogeneous backends while preserving their individual strengths.
The Multi-Backend Challenge
AI memory systems face a fundamental tension: no single storage technology optimally serves all access patterns:
| Operation | Optimal Backend | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic search | Vector DB | Embedding similarity, ANN algorithms |
| Exact recall | Relational DB | B-tree indexes, ACID guarantees |
| Relationship queries | Graph DB | Traversal, path finding |
| Keyword search | Full-text index | Inverted indexes, ranking |
| Session storage | Relational DB | Transactional integrity |
Traditional approaches suffer from:
- Inheritance-based polymorphism: Creates rigid hierarchies that resist extension
- Adapter patterns: Introduce runtime overhead and obscure capabilities
- Direct backend coupling: Prevents migration and testing
The Protocol Solution
Our approach uses Python's Protocol classes for structural subtyping:
from typing import Protocol, runtime_checkable
@runtime_checkable
class StorageProtocol(Protocol):
"""Base protocol for all storage backends."""
def save(self, memory: Memory) -> str: ...
def get(self, memory_id: str) -> Memory | None: ...
def delete(self, memory_id: str) -> bool: ...
@property
def capabilities(self) -> StorageCapabilities: ...
Any class implementing these methods satisfies the protocol—no inheritance required.
Capability Detection
Backends declare their capabilities at runtime:
@dataclass
class StorageCapabilities:
supports_vector_search: bool = False
supports_graph_queries: bool = False
supports_full_text: bool = False
supports_transactions: bool = False
max_embedding_dimensions: int = 0
The StorageRouter uses these capabilities for intelligent routing:
class StorageRouter:
def search(self, query: str, **kwargs) -> list[Memory]:
if self.vector_store.capabilities.supports_vector_search:
return self.vector_store.semantic_search(query)
else:
# Fallback to full-text search
return self.relational_store.text_search(query)
Results
Our evaluation in the ContextFS AI memory system demonstrates:
- 67% reduction in coupling compared to inheritance-based designs
- Sub-50ms latency overhead for the routing layer
- 100% recovery rate from simulated backend failures
- Zero-downtime backend migrations through capability-based switching
Theoretical Foundation
We establish a category-theoretic framework where:
- Storage backends are objects
- Protocol implementations are morphisms
- Capability sets form a lattice structure
- The
StorageRouteris a universal construction
This formalization enables reasoning about storage system composition and proves properties like graceful degradation.
Implementation in ContextFS
ContextFS implements this pattern across three backend types:
- SQLite/PostgreSQL: Relational storage with ACID guarantees
- ChromaDB: Vector embeddings for semantic search
- FalkorDB (optional): Graph database for relationship queries
The StorageRouter coordinates these backends transparently, routing queries to the optimal backend based on runtime capabilities.
Conclusion
The Pluggable Typed-Storage Protocol pattern establishes a new paradigm for building resilient, extensible storage systems that can evolve with the rapidly changing landscape of AI infrastructure. By combining structural typing with capability detection, we achieve the flexibility of duck typing with the safety of static verification.
References
- Python Protocol Classes (PEP 544)
- Category Theory for Programmers - Bartosz Milewski
- Type-Safe Context Engineering - Long, M. (2025)
- ContextFS Architecture Paper - Long, M. (2025)